{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":6,"sheets":["Summary Report","Questionnaire Process Audit","Finding Report","Worksite Hard Copy","Rating System","Mod Index"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":5,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":10,"comments":2,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Summary Report","index":0,"n_rows":85,"n_cols":22,"rows_kept":85,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[31,1,32,4],[31,5,32,7],[31,8,32,9],[31,10,32,13],[65,0,66,0],[65,1,72,13],[46,9,46,10],[48,9,48,10],[48,12,48,13],[50,9,50,10],[50,12,50,13],[40,9,40,10],[40,12,40,13],[42,9,42,10],[42,12,42,13],[44,9,44,10],[74,0,74,3],[74,8,74,13],[52,9,52,10],[52,12,52,13],[53,9,53,10],[53,12,53,13],[55,1,55,13],[57,0,58,0],[57,1,64,13],[44,12,44,13],[38,9,38,10],[38,12,38,13],[33,0,35,0],[33,1,34,4],[33,5,34,7],[33,8,34,9],[33,10,34,13],[35,1,36,4],[35,5,36,7],[35,8,36,9],[35,10,36,13],[15,3,15,13],[17,3,17,13],[15,0,15,2],[17,0,17,2],[25,3,25,13],[25,1,25,2],[28,1,28,4],[28,5,28,7],[28,8,28,9],[28,10,28,13],[29,1,30,4],[29,5,30,7],[29,8,30,9],[29,10,30,13],[9,1,9,13],[10,7,10,10],[11,0,11,2],[11,3,11,13],[13,3,13,4],[13,12,13,13],[13,7,13,11],[7,1,7,13],[0,3,1,8],[0,11,0,13],[1,11,1,13],[3,1,3,13],[5,1,5,13],[2,11,2,13]]}
[null,null,null,"VS002 Process Audit \n- Summary Report -",null,null,null,null,null,null,"Audit No./Year:"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Audit start date"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Audit end date"]
["Company:"]
[]
["Address:"]
[]
["Process(es):"]
[]
["Products:"]
[]
["Quality Certifications"]
[]
["Total number of employees:",null,null,null,null,null,null,"Employees working in Quality Dept.:"]
[]
["Main customer(s):"]
[]
["Main raw material supplier used:"]
[]
["Audit reason:","Regular audit:"]
[null,"Initial audit for new supplier:"]
[null,"Initial audit for new process:"]
[null,"Audit due to quality incident:"]
[null,"Audit due to process change (for example relocation):"]
[]
[null,"Other Reason:"]
[]
[]
[null,"Name",null,null,null,"Position",null,null,"Phone",null,"E-Mail"]
["Auditor(s):",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Format cells to same shape and as text fields, shall extend when more names are needed"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null," "]
["Participants and position:"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"All pages shall be printable in DIN A 4."]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Questionnaire sheet may become 2 or 3 pages when printing- to be tested"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"This audit",null,null,"Previous audit"]
[null,"Audit date"]
[]
[null,"Number of Major Non-conformities:",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"COUNTIF('Questionnaire Process Audit'!I:I,\"X\")","v":0}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"RED"]
[null,"Number of Minor Non-conformities:",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"COUNTIF('Questionnaire Process Audit'!J:J,\"X\")","v":0},null,null,null,null,null,"YELLOW"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"GREEN"]
[null,"Number of Improvement Potentials:",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"COUNTIF('Questionnaire Process Audit'!K:K,\"X\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,"Amount of answered questions (Max 105)",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"COUNTIF('Questionnaire Process Audit'!G:G,\"X\")","v":105}]
[]
[null,"Amount of answered questions in %",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"COUNTIF('Questionnaire Process Audit'!G:G,\"X\")/105","v":1}]
[]
[null,"Latest correction date:",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"2017-02-08"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Corrective actions\nto be completed (Audit date + 90 days)",null,null,"Corrective actions\ncompleted"]
["Audit Result",{"$f":"IF(AND(J41=0,J43=0,J45<=11),P44,\nIF(AND(J41=0,AND(J43>=1,J43<=6),J45>=11),P43,\nIF(OR(J41>0,J43>=7),P42,P43))\n)","v":"GREEN"},null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF(L2<>\"\",EDATE(L2,3),\"\")","v":""},null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null," "]
[]
["Comments"]
[]
["Improvement Areas:"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
["Best Practice Areas:"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
["Date, Process Manager signature",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Date, Auditor signature"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
["x"]
["x"]
["x"]

{"sheet":"Questionnaire Process Audit","index":1,"n_rows":119,"n_cols":18,"rows_kept":119,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[37,3,37,12],[17,3,17,12],[115,3,115,12],[101,3,101,12],[93,3,93,12],[65,3,65,12],[48,3,48,12],[101,0,101,2],[108,1,112,1],[115,0,115,2],[17,0,17,2],[69,1,71,1],[83,1,84,1],[85,1,86,1],[93,0,93,2],[37,0,37,2],[42,1,46,1],[48,0,48,2],[65,0,65,2],[3,12,4,12],[5,0,5,2],[3,0,4,0],[3,1,4,1],[3,2,4,2],[3,3,4,3],[3,4,4,4],[0,2,1,2],[0,6,0,11],[1,6,1,11],[2,6,2,11],[3,5,4,5],[3,6,3,7],[3,8,3,11]]}
[null,null,"VS002 Process Audit\n- Questionnaire -",null,null,null,"Audit No./Year:",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!L1<>\"\",'Summary Report'!L1,\"\")","v":""}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"Audit Date:",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!L2<>\"\",'Summary Report'!L2,\"\")","v":""}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"Process:",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!B8<>\"\",'Summary Report'!B8,\"\")","v":""}]
["Quest.\nNo.","Section\nAudit Reference","Question","Review","Go See","Guidelines and Guideline-Questions","Audited",null,"Answers/ Rating",null,null,null,"Observations/ Findings / Remarks\nNote:  For non-conformance findings: record the  document, part number, process number, machine number, operator etc.  that has been audited for  traceability and future follow up.\n"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"yes","no","Major","Minor","Improvement","Conform"]
["1 Sub- Supplier Management of audited Company"]
[]
["1.1","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5 5.1","Are only approved/released and quality-capable sub-suppliers selected?","R",null,"Review:\n• The process for selecting sub-supplier (criteria). \n• Assessment of quality capability and performance (audits and ongoing performance).\n• Sufficient capacities must be secured with suppliers. \n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.2","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5 5.2","Are the Veoneer's requirements taken into account in the supply chain?","R",null,"Review:\n• Supply chain is controlled and monitored. \n• Requirements have been communicated and agreed to the whole supply chain (VS 52 and VS 69, etc.).\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.3","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5 5.3","Have target agreements for sub-supplier performance been agreed with suppliers and put into operation?","R",null,"Review:\n• Target agreements i.e. supplier rating, score cards for supply and quality performance and continuous improvement have been coordinated and implemented.\n• Are measures to deal with deviations in place? \n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.4","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5 5.4","Are the necessary approvals/releases available for the out-sourced products and services?","R",null,"Review::\n• Before series production starts, is material and product  PPAP approved.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.5","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5 5.5","Is the quality of the out-sourced products and services ensured?","R","G","Review::\n• Quality Assurance Agreement is in place.\n• Adequate testing facilities (internal/external) are available and approved (by the customer or accredited according to ISO/IEC 17025).\n• Clearly defined claim management (Q- discussions, improvement programs, etc.) is in place.\n• Capability proof for special characteristics exists.\n• Requalification test.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.6","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5 5.6","Are incoming goods stored appropriately?","R","G","Review:\n• Raw material deliveries and carrier containers are stored so that damage and mix-proof are prevented. \n• FIFO (First in first out) principles will apply (bar code, system supported, manual).\n\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.7","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5 5.7","Are personnel qualified to communicate to sub-supplier for the various requirements?","R",null,"Review:\n• Formal SQE management department available\n• SQE training and capability\n• Supplier quality engineers assigned to sub-suppliers","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.8","VSM","Does supplier have an agreed change notification procedures from their suppliers.","R",null,"Review:\n• Supplier's change notification process","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.9","VSM,\nIATF 16949 6.1.2.3","Has the supplier taken appropriate measures to assess contingency planning within the downstream supply chain. ","R",null,"Review:\n• Application of  suppliers process to assess sub-suppliers.\n• Critical materials required in the manufacture of Veoneer products should be assessed.   ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.10","VSM","Suppliers only: Do manufacturing lot sizes meet Veoneer requirements?","R",null,"Review:\n• Supplier lot size meets Veoneer requirements","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2 General Requirements"]
["2.1","VDA P7 7.1","Is supplier certified to IATF 16949, or ISO 9001 international standards?","R",null,"Review:\n• Third party certification and VGPS update","X",null,null,null,null,"X",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MA\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MI\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"IP\",\"C\")))","v":"MA"}]
["2.2","VS 31\nVDA P7 7.1","Is supplier certified to ISO 14001 international standards?","R",null,"Review:\n• Third party certification and VGPS update","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.3","VDA P7 7.1","If 2.2 above answer no then: Have tasks which have influence on the environment been included in the environmental system requirements?","R",null,"Review:\n• A contact person for environmental affairs is appointed.\n• Information about environmental topics is available to all employees.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.4","VSM, P7 7.2 + 7.3","Is Veoneer and Supplier communication efficient?","R",null,"Review:\n• VPP supplier profile current.\n• Supplier understands how product is used in our application.\n• Supplier's use of SREA\n• Supplier understands Veoneer's escalation model (VSM).\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.5","VS 4 P6 6.6.4","Are all process records handled in accordance to related record retention procedures (for suppliers: VS 4)?","R","G","Review:\n• Record retention procedures are documented and followed","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.6","VDA P7 7.1","Are customer specifications, VSM requirements and expectations well known and appropriately implemented in the process? ","R",null,"Review:\n• Procedure for Contract Review/ SQP\n• Specifications are agreed by Veoneer and the supplier. VSM acknowledged \n","X",null,null,null,null,"X",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MA\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MI\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"IP\",\"C\")))","v":"MA"}]
["2.7","VDA P7  7.1","Are the current versions available on site or distributed / updated timely to the process responsible?","R",null,"Review:\n• How the document revision control managed.  \nConfirm latest version.","X",null,null,null,null,"X",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MA\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MI\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"IP\",\"C\")))","v":"MA"}]
["2.8","Legal Requirements\nIATF 16949\n8.2.2.1\n8.4.1.1\nVDA P7 7.1","Are all legal requirements well known and appropriately implemented in the process?","R",null,"Review:\n• Examples: legal ES test requirements, D.O.T. shipping requirements","X",null,null,null,null,"X",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MA\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MI\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"IP\",\"C\")))","v":"MA"}]
["2.9",null,"Are the current versions available on site or distributed / updated timely to the process responsible?","R",null,"Review;\n• How the document revision control managed.  \n• Confirm latest version.","X",null,null,null,null,"X",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MA\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MI\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"IP\",\"C\")))","v":"MA"}]
["2.10","VS 51\nVDA P7  7.1  7.3","Is the actual quality and delivery performance evaluated by the customer and Is this known by the operational level (workers, team leader etc.)?",null,"G","Veoneer VS 51 results.\n• VS 51 reviewed on a monthly basis,\n• Rating and results communicated internal and external\n• Corrective action defined in case of red ratings or continuous Yellow results","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.11","VDA P7 7.1","Is the process responsible aware how well the Veoneer expectations have been met by the process, from the customer point of view?","R",null,"Review:\nVeoneer evaluation result is subject to corrective action (or, if satisfying, to continuous improvement)?","X",null,null,null,null,"X",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MA\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MI\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"IP\",\"C\")))","v":"MA"}]
["2.12","Failure Management / Problem Solving\nVS 63\n\n\n\n\n\n","Are customer rejects regularly analyzed and actions derived from this analysis and implemented ","R","G","Review:\nVeoneer returns activity associated with line improvement.\nVeoneer NCMs are closed in an appropriate timeframe, with Veoneer approval","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.13","\nVDA P6 6.5.2\nVDA P6 6.5.3","Are product / process failures systematically analyzed and corrected with involvement from a cross functional team? (Example: internal ppm, scrap, machine downtime) ","R","G","Review:\n• Company Policy - Continuous improvement activity.\n• Failure costs must be recorded and evaluated according to the cause.\n• Personnel + Test equipment are available to carry out analysis of defect part\n• Red Bin Audit requirement\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.14","VDA P7 7.4 + 7.5","Are common problem solving methods used? (Example: 7 Tools, 8D)  Are tools to monitor the process in use? (Example: PDCA, QOS, etc.)","R",null,"Review:\n• Use of method and results\n• FMEA and control plan are updated as a result of the root cause analysis\n• Corrective action effectiveness is monitored\n\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.15","VDA P7 7.4 ","Are “lessons learned” systematically documented and is this information used by the process responsible, also on similar and new processes for continuous improvement?\n(Including multiple facilities with the same potential failure)","R",null,"Review:\n• Confirm procedure for yoko-ten implemented","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.16","Change Management \nVDA P6 6.1.5 ","Are changes to the product or process in the course of serial production tracked and documented?\n\n","R",null,"Review:\n• The change procedure – i.e. from the change request to implementation – must be clearly described and ownership/responsibility established. \nVeoneer must be involved. \n• The effect of any changes must be analyzed before they are introduced. \n• Scope of applicability for own production and sub-contractors. \n• Deviation from requirements (including packaging and transport)","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.17","VDA P7 7.3","Is the supply of parts ensured?","R",null,"Review:\n• VS 51 On time part performance                              \n• Emergency plans\n• Supplier has 24 hour contact for Veoneer.\n• Internal and external capacities","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.18","VDA P7 7.3 ","Is the suppliers facility systematically and regularly analyzed by a cross functionally team on contingency planning? \n\n","R",null,"Review:\n• Company Policy - Contingency Plan (List document number)\n• The current document reviewed is done by a cross functional team, timely  / risk based review.  \n• Contingency assessed for Fire, Flood, Explosion, Strike, Weather, Act of god. \n• PESTEL factors - Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental and Legal factors.\n• Review contingency for utilities failure management - Water, Gas, Oil (Fuel) and Electricity.  ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.19","VDA P6  6.1..1 ","Is there a documented process to transfer the project from development to serial production?\n\n\n","R",null,"Review:\n• Handover from (development) project and serial production is defined. \n• PPAP (production process and product approval) has been given.\n• Safe launch validation is established. VS-412. \n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3. Process Documentation"]
["3.1","Process FMEA\nVS 104,           VDA P4 4.1 P6 6.5.3","Does a process flowchart and P-FMEA exist?","R",null,"Review:\n• Flowchart, process layout and P-FMEA documents\n• Key product and process numbers are defined, documented and a projection-vs.-actual comparison made.\n• P-FMEA compliant to AIAG FMEA Manual 4th Edition  ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.2","Control Plan\nVDA P6 6.2.1 +7.1\nVSM","Is a Control Plan existing and current when compared to actual process?",null,"G","Review:\n• Control Plan at work site and inspection plans.\n(Annual Layout inspection - VSM requirement)\n(Annual PV test - Customer Requirements)","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.3","VS 41,  VDA P6 6.6.1","Are Dock Audit requirements defined and part of the Control plan: agreed for launch or after severe nonconformities?","R",null,"Review:\n• Dock Audit Report process.","X",null,null,null,null,"X",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MA\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MI\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"IP\",\"C\")))","v":"MA"}]
["3.4","VSM, VDA P6 6.1.1","Are all delivered products approved by the Veoneer?","R",null,"Review:\n• PSW signed by Veoneer.\n• IRW and action plan tracked to closure.","X",null,null,null,null,"X",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MA\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"MI\",IF(SUM(ISBLANK(#REF!)*1)<1,\"IP\",\"C\")))","v":"MA"}]
["3.5","Measurement & Inspection devices\nVDA P6 6.2.1\nVDA P6 6.4.2\n VDA P6 6.4.3 \n\n","Have Gage R&R studies according to AIAG Manual MSA been performed on all equipment / methods used for manufacturing and test?","R",null,"Review:\n• Gage R&R documents against AIAG requirements","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.6",null,"Is appropriate action taken, when MSA results do not meet requirements?","R",null,"Review:\n• Action plan to improve and qualify inspection devices","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.7",null,"Are all gages, including employee owned gages, registered for scheduled calibration?","R","G","Review:\n• Randomly chose a gage and verify it is and compliant to calibration procedure and documented \n• Review calibration procedure for master rejects and boundary samples ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.8",null,"Is there a system to manage parts and gages when unplanned gage damage or out of calibration condition occurs?","R",null,"Review:\n• Calibration procedure and suspect material procedure","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.9",null,"Has a correlation study been done between test sites for measurement system on similar parameter?","R",null,"Review:\n• Tester data correlation results between sites (internal to supplier or between supplier and Veoneer) • For example:   electrical parameters and function, tensile tester, hardness measurement, color measurement device, air permeability","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.10","Change Control\nVS 7\nVDA P6 6.1.5","Is there a process to control and react to changes that impact product realization","R",null,"Review:\n• Requirements for Veoneer notification are defined and compliant.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4. Manufacturing Process \n4.1 Material Flow\n"]
["4.1.1","Incoming Material \n\nIATF 16949 6.1.2.3\nVDA P6 6.1.2","Are incoming goods inspected systematically according to their specification and according to the control plan?",null,"G","Review:\n• Inspection procedure to Control Plan\n• Inspection instructions and results are properly documented\n• Goods are easy to locate, identifiable and traceable in the incoming area\n• Approved parts are clearly identified prior to being put into inventory\n\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.2","VDA P6 6.1.2 ","Is there a procedure for non-conforming incoming material","R","G","Review: \n• Procedure and verify nonconforming material is segregated (Quarantine/ blocking are) and identified.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.3","VDA P6 6.1.2 ","Is corrective action required of (sub-) suppliers for non-conformances? ","R","G","Review:\n• Responses are timely.\n• Effectiveness is verified.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.4","VDA P6 6.1.2 ","If incoming inspection is waived, is there evidence for sufficient (sub-) supplier's component quality assurance?","R","G","Review: \n• Procedure/criteria for decision to waive inspection.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.5","VDA P 6 6.1.4","Are the necessary identifications/records/approvals available and allocated properly to the incoming materials?",null,null,"• Check identification, release on material / systems, Material certificate, CC/ SC, traceable","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.6","FIFO\nVDA P6 6.1.4","Are material and goods handled according to first in /first out (FIFO)?","R","G","Review:\n• procedure / Go & See\n• Verify traceability of material to the manufacturing equipment.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.7","VDA 6.1.2","Are the necessary quantities/production batch sizes of incoming material available right in time and at the right location?",null,"G","• Check on an example, if right product is at right place, in right quality (approved) in right quantity and with right packing and documentation.  \n• Check also MRP System data ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.8","Material Handling \nVDA P6 6.1.3","Are products / components stored in an appropriate manner and are transport facilities / packing arrangements suitable for the special characteristics of the products / components? ",null,"G","• Protection from damage during storage and packing is guaranteed.\n• Customer-specific packaging instructions have been implemented.\n• Tidiness and cleanliness in storage areas / containers are assumed.\n• Protection of components against environmental / climate influences have been arranged.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.9","VDA P6 6.1.4","What is procedure for specified storage time / durability of time and/or temperature materials?","R","G","Review:\n• Verify shelf life and storage process for time and/or  temperature materials, appropriate equipment ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.10","VDA P6 6.2.6","Are similar parts (for example different CS sensor types) clearly identifiable and segregated to avoid mix up in production and the ware house ?","R","G","Review:\n• Process / Go & See","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.11","VDA P6 6.2.6","Is the flow of materials and parts secured against mixing /wrong items? (for example engineering level A/B)",null,"G","• Check for method to assure segregation, prevent mixing of different items,                                     \n• Process to return part, reworked parts handling, re-use of measured parts ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.12","VDA P6 6.1.4","Are suitable production containers for product transport within manufacturing clearly defined and storage space is available?",null,"G","• Go & See storage and transport of production material on the line.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.13","Rework\nVDA P6 6.2.5","If rework is performed are parts identified to the agreed Veoneer requirements?  ","R",null,"Review:\n• Rework process is in the PFMEA, control plan and work instructions.  \n• Separate area available. \n• Operator trained on rework process.\n• Traceability records for reworked parts.\n• Individual part marking\n• and incoming to Veoneer packaging identification.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.14","Red Bin Audit \nHandling of Non-Conforming Material\n8.3\nVDA P6 6.2.5","Are all nonconforming parts identified and then contained in Red Bin (Early detection and removal of incorrectly used parts must be guaranteed)?","R","G","Review:\n• Non-conforming Procedure.\nGo & See\n• Is the quarantine area identified?\n• Timely and proper disposition of non-conforming material is ensured\n• All potentially non-conforming material is identified and treated as nonconforming","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.15","Delays\nVDA P6 6.6.1","Is there a system for delivery suspension in place and communication to Veoneer set up in case of non conforming material or material-shortage?","R",null,"Review:\n• MRB Material Review Board minutes\n• Cross functional team assessment in daily production meeting and information flow\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.1.16","Recycling \nVDA P6 6.2.5 ","The process for recycling for production residues, separated, reworked and re-used parts from product audits and tests, etc. must be clearly regulated. ","R","G","• Review procedure and assure Veoneer agreement (drawing).\n• In-plant residues must be appropriately quantified, marked and stored.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4. Manufacturing Process\n 4.2 Production Process"]
["4.2.1","Process Equipment\nVDA P6 6.4.3","Is the needed production equipment available and fit for use?","R","G","Review:\n• Procedure for equipment validation and approved\n\n• Unreleased equipment is identified and appropriately stored to avoid unauthorized use.\n• Backup processes are available and approved to avoid production breakdown.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.2","VDA P6 6.4.4","Are Veoneer/customer owned tools and equipment clearly identifiable (tagged) and handled according to Veoneer /customer requirements?",null,"G","• Property tag  clearly displayed on the tool/equipment\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.3",null,"Are malfunctioning automated processes temporarily replaced by manual operation?","R","G","Review:\n• Check company policy / approval\n• These operations are handled according to the process standards for manual processes (regarding documentation, training, inspection)\n• These instances are documented and tied to lot traceability records.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.4","Working Conditions\n\nVDA P6 6.4.3","Are all working areas kept in a way that the specified product quality and quantity can be produced continually?",null,"G","• Working conditions and housekeeping are subject to evaluation and continuous improvement (Example: Safety, 5S, programs enough light for visual checks, and noise inspection in quiet areas, Ergonomics ).","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.5",null,"Is manufacturing environment controlled according to product requirements (i.e.: Humidity, Temperature, Air Pressure, and Time)?","R","G","Review:\n• Method and confirm reaction plan","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.6",null,"As applicable: Is defectivity (cleanliness and particle) controlled in the clean room and process equipment?","R","G","Review:\n• Method and confirm reaction plan","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.7","Special Process VS 69\nVDA P6 6.2.3","Has the manufacturing process been systematically analyzed for critical/special processes (for example plating, coating, welding, riveting, and heat treatment)? ","R",null,"Review:\n• Process of analyzing and documenting critical sub processes  ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.8","Special Process VS 69\nVDA P6 6.2.4","Are critical/special process parameters monitored and controlled?","R",null,"Review:\n• Critical/special process controls / historical data","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.9","Special Process VS 69\nVDA P6 6.2.4","Are critical/special process parameters part of the control plan?","R","G","Review:\n• Critical/special processes are in place, analyzed and assessed on annual basis (VS 69 special process / CQI xxx). \n• Compare parameters to Control Plan.\n\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.10","Process Parameter\nVDA P6 6.2.1 + 6.2.2","Are process parameters properly controlled and prevented from unauthorized changes?","R","G","Review:\n• Confirm method to assure process parameters are controlled or locked out from adjustment","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.11","Testing\nVDA P6 6.4.2","Can the quality requirements be monitored effectively with the test, inspection and measurement facilities employed?",null,"G","• Test and measurement equipment in use is listed in the production control plan.\n• Measures must be taken and documented in process malfunctions.\n• Quality and process data are logged in such a way that they can be assessed.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.12","Operator Responsibility\nVDA P6  6.3.1","Are operators empowered (given responsibility and authority) to monitor the quality of product and process?","R",null,"Review:\n• Competencies, duties and authority of each employee in their particular area of responsibility must be specified. \n• Quality awareness in employees must be encouraged with appropriate measures and regularly refreshed\n• Personnel should be regularly informed about the customer's current quality standard.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.13","VDAP6 6.4.3 ","Are identification of inspection and test status for products maintained and suitable at each stage of production?",null,"G","• Confirm the system and review example \n• Bypassing or miss a process step possible? \n• Are the workstations and test/inspection areas suitable for the requirements ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.14","Product and Process Documents\n4.2.3 + 7.5\nVDA P6. 6.3.2 \n","Do work, inspection and packaging instructions exist and do they clearly describe process operations to employees?","R",null,"Review:\n• Work instructions\n• A system for products and process approval must exist\n• The marking of approvals is determined.\n• Records of approvals are documented and archived.\n• Special releases / deviation permission are marked and documented.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.15","VDA P6 6.2.1","Are the instructions in accordance with the process?",null,"G","Go & See / compare instruction to actual process\n\n• Workers are able to read and understand the instructions (language problem)?\n• Instructions refer to corrective action measures in case of non-conformances.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.16","VDA P6 6.2.1","Are the instructions controlled documents? In case multiple copies of instructions are necessary, are the documents the same revision?","R","G","• Confirm method of control of documents including revision \n• Controlled part and assembly drawings exist. The instructions / drawings identify CC/SCs (VS 52)?","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.17","VDA P6 6.2.1","Do Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for chemicals and hazardous materials used in the process exist, and do the personnel using the material know and understand the safety requirements?","R","G","Review:\n• Go & See / ask personnel for MSDS on material in their area","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.18","Production Start-Up - First piece sample inspection\n\nVDA P6 6.2.2 ","Are first produced parts after shift start-up, order changes or maintenance activities specially inspected to detect errors (for example incorrect parts used, wrong parameter setup, operator error...)?","R",null,"Review:\n• Part approval process / Maintenance log\n• Are these inspections / tests clearly defined in work instructions and recorded.\n\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.19",null,"Are startup/first piece inspections documented and maintained?","R","G","Review:\n• Confirm documented inspections\n• Review startup after break down and maintenance. • Setting plans, setting aids and reference parts must be available at workplace","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.20","Process Control and SPC\n8.2.3 + 8.4\nVDA P6 6.2.3","Are process control charts maintained and analyzed / including reaction plans?","R","G","• Review chart, see documented reaction plan for out of control situation","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.21",null,"Are process records (i.e.: control charts) correctly designed (i.e.: regarding control limits) and known and understood by the personnel creating the records?",null,"G","• Go & See controls on the floor / ask personnel\n• Process records clearly indicate deviations from the specification.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.22","Initial process capability\nIATF 16949 8.3.3.3, 8.3.5.2, 8.6.4\nAIAG Manual APQP & MSA\nVS 52, VSM,\nVDA P6 6.2.4 ","Are CC/SC characteristics identified, and controlled by SPC or other as defined is VS 52?","R","G","Review:\n• SPC control charts at the worksite \n• All CC/SC variable characteristics are capable.\n• Are sample size  and sampling plan appropriate","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.23","VDA P6 6.2.4","For continuous production is appropriate action taken, when Cpk  is below specification?","R",null,"Review:\n• Action plan for Cpk below specification.\n• Capability studies have been performed according to AIAG and VS 52 requirements.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.24","Mistake -proofing\n8.5.2.2 \nVDA P6 6.2.3 + 6.2.6","Is mistake-proofing (Poka-Yoke) in place, functioning and controlled?",null,"G","Review:\n• Poka Yoke verification process.\n• Existing Poka Yoke devices cannot be bypassed or switched off.\n• Master verification samples are used to validate the Poka Yoke.\n• All mistake proofing devices are validated regularly (wear and tear).\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.25","VDA P6 6.2.3 + 6.2.6","Does the Poka-Yoke stop the process for reject part review; or at a minimum, segregate the reject part from the good parts automatically?",null,"G","• Method for parts segregation and handling","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.26","VDA P6 6.2.3 + 6.2.6 ","When sensors are used are they programmed for a state change?  Example: Sensor must cycle to accept a part, to assure sensor is not faulty?","R","G","Review:\n• Method for verification of on/off conditions.\n• Master verification samples are used to validate the sensors.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.2.27","Tool and equipment Storage\n \nVDA P6 6.4.4","Are tools, equipment and test/inspection facilities stored correctly?",null,"G","• Tools and test equipment are properly stored and managed.\n• All tools and test equipment properly checked and are marked with their original and changed status.\n• Tidiness, cleanliness and protection against environmental influences are ensure.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4. Manufacturing Process\n 4.3 Final Inspection, Packing, Storage, Shipping"]
["4.3.1","Final Inspection / Shipping\nVS 244 + VS 41\nVDA P6 6.6.1","Is all finished product systematically inspected, requirements met and released before Storage","R","G","Review: \n• Confirm Veoneer/customer requirements  agreed for product inspection release and approval .\n• The responsibility to approve products for shipment is clearly defined.\n• Is assured that only approved parts can be sent to the customer. \n• There is a process of communication in the event if shipment of products is blocked.                            \n• Dock audits requirements and results. If dock audit is requested by Veoneer. \n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.3.2","VDA P6 6.6.2","Are quantities / production batch sizes aligned with requirements and are they forwarded to the next process stage/warehouse in a targeted manner?",null,null,"Review: \n• Suitable transport facilities and storage location available\n• Identification/labeling of parts/material\n• Right quantities available physical and in MRP System\n• Is there a controlled process for handling or NOK parts\n• Veoneer requirements available and agreed in case rework is implemented ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.3.3","VS 244 /VS 246 VDA P6 6.6.3","Is all finished product packaged according to customer / Veoneer approved specifications and are they stored in an appropriate manner?",null,"G","• Verify Veoneer shipping/packaging requirements\n• Packaging specification available and agreed\n• Labels conforms to VS-244.\n• Parts are protected against the effects of climate and environment\n• Protection against damage\n• Cleanliness and tidiness are assured in storage and packing","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.3.4","Traceability\nVS 4\nVDA P6 6.6.2 6.6.4\n","Are components and products identifiable and traceable from incoming to delivery? \nIs there evidence of annual Trial being conducted and is the time to retrieve and data reconciliation compliant to maximum time requirements in VS 4?\n","R","G","Review: \n• Records of releases/ are documented and archived\n• Special releases/deviation approvals are identified and documented.\n• Last exercise conducted, time to retrieve and reconcile data.\n• Verify exercise contains both Forward and Backward Traceability examples","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.3.5","VDA P6 6.6.4","Is a Traceability flowchart available and what kind of data are recorded","R",null,"Review:\n• Traceability flowchart available and current. Data in accordance to the Traceability  Data Requirements Chart (in VS 4)\n• Record retention for 20 Years and Archive condition","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.3.6","VDA P6 6.6.2","Do manufacturing lot sizes meet Veoneer requirements? Is a new lot number assigned after Raw material, Process, Tooling/Equipment or Personnel change occurs?","R",null,"Review:\n• Supplier definition of lot size and method for compliance to Veoneer requirements (24 Hours Production or 20, 000 pieces maximum).\n• Documented process to assign new Lot Number to product.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.3.7","VDA P7 7.1","A traceability data available for Special characteristics SC/CC ","R",null,"Review:\n• Evidence available of tracking and archiving  special  characteristics (documentation requirements) and record retention\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4. Manufacturing Process\n 4.4 Support Processes"]
["4.4.1","Manpower\n6.2\nVDA P6  6.3.1 + 6.3.2\nVDA P7  7.6","Are all personnel (all shifts and temporary employees) – manufacturing, maintenance and support, trained and instructed properly (including automotive industry quality requirements)?","R",null,"Review:\n• Training matrix / documents for all level of personnel\n• Customer, standard and legislative requirements\n• Veoneer Standard language (English) is understood by main contact personnel.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.2","VDA P6 6.3.3 ","Is there a new hire / temporary position training requirement to assure employees are approved prior to performing the job?","R",null,"Review:\n• New hire requirements\n• Training matrix and procedures are in place and documented.\n• Are training needs defined for each job description?\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.3","VDA P6.6.3.2 ","Is training effectiveness measured and documented?","R",null,"Review:\n• Training policy for effectiveness measure","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.4","Supplier \nInternal audits\nVDA P6 6.5.4","Are processes and products internally audited regularly?","R","G","Review:\n• Audit plan for Product and Processes and reasons defined\n• Audit findings regularly reviewed and actions closed per schedule.\n• Audit frequency is adjusted to production volume, criticality of product / process, and process stability.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.5","VDA P6 6.5.4","Are auditors qualified and experienced? ","R",null,"Review:\n• Training matrix","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.6","VDA P6 6.5.4 ","Are Veoneer audit findings and systemic corrective actions from NCMs incorporated into the internal audit?","R",null,"Review:\n• Process to incorporate Veoneer/customer concerns. (i.e.:  Dock audit, red bin audit,)","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.7","Tooling and Machine Preventive Maintenance\nVDA P6 6.4.1","Is the process, test equipment and tooling part of the preventive maintenance system (PM)?","R","G","Review:\n• PM schedule\n• The PM system does include monitoring and optimization of maintenance activity frequencies, perishable tooling and machine downtime","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.8",null,"Are planned and unplanned maintenance activities documented?","R",null,"Review:\n• Maintenance Log, work orders, Preventative maintenance, and perishable tooling","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.9",null,"Is needed maintenance equipment / spare parts available?","R","G","Review:\n• Confirm method/system for determining and maintaining spare part inventory","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.10",null,"Is any process interruption systematically requalified after maintenance / breakdowns?  ","R",null,"Review:\n• Procedure for 1st piece/last piece confirmation.  \n• For electronics cleanliness and particle defect inspection on process monitor or production parts ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.11",null,"Do procedures exist for proper equipment power down and power up after extended shutdown?","R",null,"Review equipment start up procedures","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.12","Tooling Life Management\nVDAP6 6.4.1\n","Is there a procedure to assure tooling used for production are under tool life and tool orders are timely?","R",null,"Review:\n• Tooling list.\n• Compare actual tool usage with contract agreement.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["4.4.13","Spare Part Management\nVDAP7 7.1 ","Are the Veoneer Requirements satisfied regarding product Spare part Delivery?","R",null,"• Is the supply of spares and replacement parts (in and after serial production phase - End of production secured and considered?\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["5. Improvement"]
["5.1","Continuous Improvement\n8.5.1\nVDA P6 6.5.1 ","Is a comprehensive continuous improvement philosophy deployed throughout the organization including management support?","R",null,"Review: \n• Management Reviews \n• Company Policy Deployment - Vision and Mission, Potential for improvements is continuously determined. \n• Product and Process indicators are defined, measured and controlled including non-conformances","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["5.2","VDA P6 6.5.2","Are process targets defined and are they regularly reviewed and refined?","R",null,"Review: \n•  Regular Production  Reviews \n• Quality control charts operated, Process data and - parameter are monitored, actions are introduced and documented. \n• Failure types and their frequency are recorded and evaluated, Failure costs are recorded and assessed against their causes       ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["5.3","VSM","Has a lean manufacturing system been implemented?","R",null,"Review:  \n• Lean implementation plan/process.\n• Lean tools uses of APS concepts.\n• Lean manufacturing leader is assigned.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]

{"sheet":"Finding Report","index":2,"n_rows":152,"n_cols":13,"rows_kept":152,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,4,1,7],[2,4,2,7]]}
[null,null,null,null,"VS002 Process Audit \n- Audit Finding Report  -",null,null,null,"Audit No./Year:",{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!L1<>\"\",'Summary Report'!L1,\"\")","v":""}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Audit date:",{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!L2<>\"\",'Summary Report'!L2,\"\")","v":""}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Process:",{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!B8<>\"\",'Summary Report'!B8,\"\")","v":""}]
["Dev. No.","Systematic","Process specific","Audit Question Number","Finding / Improvement potential","Rating","Root Cause","Corrective action","Responsible","Planned Correction\nDate\n(DD-MMM-YYYY)","PDCA","Final Completion\nDate\n(DD-MMM-YYYY)","Follow-up / Comments / References"]
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
[57]
[58]
[59]
[60]
[61]
[62]
[63]
[64]
[65]
[66]
[67]
[68]
[69]
[70]
[71]
[72]
[73]
[74]
[75]
[76]
[77]
[78]
[79]
[80]
[81]
[82]
[83]
[84]
[85]
[86]
[87]
[88]
[89]
[90]
[91]
[92]
[93]
[94]
[95]
[96]
[97]
[98]
[99]
[100]
[101]
[102]
[103]
[104]
[105]
[106]
[107]
[108]
[109]
[110]
[111]
[112]
[113]
[114]
[115]
[116]
[117]
[118]
[119]
[120]
[121]
[122]
[123]
[124]
[125]
[126]
[127]
[128]
[129]
[130]
[131]
[132]
[133]
[134]
[135]
[136]
[137]
[138]
[139]
[140]
[141]
[142]
[143]
[144]
[145]
[146]
[147]
[148]

{"sheet":"Worksite Hard Copy","index":3,"n_rows":121,"n_cols":17,"rows_kept":121,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[115,12,115,13],[116,12,116,13],[117,12,117,13],[118,12,118,13],[119,12,119,13],[106,12,106,13],[107,12,107,13],[108,12,108,13],[109,12,109,13],[110,12,110,13],[111,12,111,13],[112,12,112,13],[113,12,113,13],[114,12,114,13],[97,12,97,13],[98,12,98,13],[99,12,99,13],[100,12,100,13],[101,12,101,13],[102,12,102,13],[103,12,103,13],[104,12,104,13],[105,12,105,13],[88,12,88,13],[89,12,89,13],[90,12,90,13],[91,12,91,13],[92,12,92,13],[93,12,93,13],[94,12,94,13],[95,12,95,13],[96,12,96,13],[79,12,79,13],[80,12,80,13],[81,12,81,13],[82,12,82,13],[83,12,83,13],[84,12,84,13],[85,12,85,13],[86,12,86,13],[87,12,87,13],[70,12,70,13],[71,12,71,13],[72,12,72,13],[73,12,73,13],[74,12,74,13],[75,12,75,13],[76,12,76,13],[77,12,77,13],[78,12,78,13],[52,12,52,13],[53,12,53,13],[54,12,54,13],[55,12,55,13],[56,12,56,13],[57,12,57,13],[58,12,58,13],[59,12,59,13],[60,12,60,13],[34,12,34,13],[35,12,35,13],[36,12,36,13],[37,12,37,13],[47,12,47,13],[48,12,48,13],[49,12,49,13],[50,12,50,13],[51,12,51,13],[38,12,38,13],[39,12,39,13],[40,12,40,13],[41,12,41,13],[42,12,42,13],[43,12,43,13],[44,12,44,13],[45,12,45,13],[46,12,46,13],[25,12,25,13],[26,12,26,13],[27,12,27,13],[28,12,28,13],[29,12,29,13],[30,12,30,13],[31,12,31,13],[32,12,32,13],[33,12,33,13],[7,3,7,13],[8,12,8,13],[9,12,9,13],[10,12,10,13],[11,12,11,13],[12,12,12,13],[13,12,13,13],[23,12,23,13],[24,12,24,13],[14,12,14,13],[15,12,15,13],[16,12,16,13],[17,12,17,13],[18,12,18,13],[19,12,19,13],[20,12,20,13],[21,12,21,13],[22,12,22,13],[0,3,0,5],[0,6,0,11],[0,13,1,13],[1,3,1,5],[1,6,1,11],[2,6,2,11],[2,12,2,13],[3,0,4,13],[5,0,6,0],[5,1,6,1],[5,2,6,2],[5,3,6,3],[5,4,6,4],[5,5,6,5],[5,6,5,7],[5,8,5,11],[5,12,6,13],[70,1,72,1],[84,1,85,1],[86,1,87,1],[94,0,94,2],[98,1,100,1],[102,0,102,2],[109,1,113,1],[116,0,116,2],[7,0,7,2],[18,0,18,2],[28,1,29,1],[30,1,33,1],[38,0,38,2],[43,1,47,1],[49,0,49,2],[66,0,66,2],[67,1,69,1],[61,12,61,13],[62,12,62,13],[63,12,63,13],[64,12,64,13],[65,12,65,13],[66,12,66,13],[67,12,67,13],[68,12,68,13],[69,12,69,13]]}
[null,null,null,"VS002 Process Audit",null,null,"Audit No./Year:",null,null,null,null,null,null,"This report should be printed and used at the site to write down necessary information.  Please input all final documentation into the applicable sections."]
[null,null,null,"- Questionnaire -",null,null,"Audit Date:"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"Process:"]
["Document part number, process number, machine number etc.  that has been audited in the findings/remarks column for traceability and future follow-up."]
[]
["Quest.\nNo.","Section\nAudit Reference","Question Items","Review","Go See","Review / Go & See ","Audited",null,"Rating"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"Yes","No","MA","MI","IP","C"]
["1 Sub- Supplier Management of audited Company"]
["1.1","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5","Are only approved/released and quality-capable sub-suppliers selected?","R",null,"Review:\n• The process for selecting sub-supplier (criteria). \n• Assessment of quality capability and performance (audits and ongoing performance).\n• Sufficient capacities must be secured with suppliers. \n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["1.2","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5","Are the Veoneer's requirements taken into account in the supply chain?","R",null,"Review:\n• Supply chain is controlled and monitored. \n• Requirements have been communicated and agreed to the whole supply chain (VS 52 and VS 69, etc.).\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["1.3","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5","Have target agreements for sub-supplier performance been agreed with suppliers and put into operation?","R",null,"Review:\n• Target agreements (i.e. supplier rating, scorecards)for supply and quality performance and continuous improvement have been coordinated and implemented.\n• Are measures to deal with deviations in place? \n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["1.4","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5","Are the necessary approvals/releases available for the out-sourced products and services?","R",null,"Review::\n• Before series production starts, is material and product  PPAP approved.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["1.5","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5","Is the quality of the out-sourced products and services ensured?","R","G","Review::\n• Quality Assurance Agreement is in place.\n• Adequate testing facilities (internal/external) are available and approved (by the customer or accredited according to ISO/IEC 17025).\n• Clearly defined claim management (Q- discussions, improvement programs, etc.) is in place.\n• Capability proof for special characteristics exists.\n• Requalification test.\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["1.6","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5","Are incoming goods stored appropriately?","R","G","Review:\n• Raw material deliveries and carrier containers are stored so that damage and mix-proof are prevented. \n• FIFO (First in first out) principles will apply (bar code, system supported, manual).\n\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["1.7","VSM, VDA 6.3 P5","Are personnel qualified to communicate to sub-supplier for the various requirements?","R",null,"Review:\n• Formal SQE management department available\n• SQE training and capability\n• Supplier quality engineers assigned to sub-suppliers",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["1.8","VSM, ","Does supplier have an agreed change notification procedures from their suppliers?","R",null,"Review:\n• Supplier's change notification process",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["1.9","VSM,\nISO 16949 6.1.3.2","Has the supplier taken appropriate measures to assess contingency planning within the downstream supply chain?","R",null,"Review:\n• Application of  suppliers process to assess sub-suppliers.\n• Critical materials required in the manufacture of Veoneer products should be assessed.   ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["1.10","VSM,","Suppliers only: Do manufacturing lot sizes meet Veoneer requirements?","R",null,"Review:\n• Supplier lot size meets Veoneer requirements",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2 General Requirements"]
["2.1","VDA P7 7.1","Is supplier certified to IATF 16949, or ISO 9001 international standards?","R",null,"Review:\n• Third party certification and VGPS update",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.2","VS 31\nVDA P7 7.1","Is supplier certified to ISO 14001 international standards?","R",null,"Review:\n• Third party certification and VGPS update",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.3","VDA P7 7.1","If 2.2 above answer no then: Have tasks which have influence on the environment been included in the environmental system requirements?","R",null,"Review:\n• A contact person for environmental affairs is appointed.\n• Information about environmental topics is available to all employees.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.4","VSM, P7 7.2 + 7.3","Is Veoneer and Supplier communication efficient?","R",null,"Review:\n• VPP supplier profile current.\n• Supplier understands how product is used in our application.\n• Supplier's use of SREA\n• Supplier understands Veoneer's escalation model (VSM).\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.5","VS 4 P6.6.4","Are all process records handled in accordance to related record retention procedures (for suppliers: VS 4)?","R","G","Review:\n• Record retention procedures are documented and followed",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.6","VDA P7 7.1","Are customer specifications, VSM requirements and expectations well known and appropriately implemented in the process? ","R",null,"Review:\n• Procedure for Contract Review/ SQP\n• Specifications are agreed by Veoneer and the supplier. VSM acknowledged \n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.7","VDA P7  7.1","Are the current versions available on site or distributed / updated timely to the process responsible?","R",null,"Review:\n• How the document revision control managed.  \nConfirm latest version.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.8","Legal Requirements\nIATF 16949\n8.2.2.1\n8.4.1.1\nVDA P7 7.1","Are all legal requirements well known and appropriately implemented in the process?","R",null,"Review:\n• Examples: legal ES test requirements, D.O.T. shipping requirements",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.9",null,"Are the current versions available on site or distributed / updated timely to the process responsible?","R",null,"Review;\n• How the document revision control managed.  \n• Confirm latest version.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.10","VS 51\nVDA P7  7.1  7.3","Is the actual quality and delivery performance evaluated by the customer and Is this known by the operational level (workers, team leader etc.)?",null,"G","Veoneer VS 51 results.\n• VS 51 reviewed on a monthly basis,\n• Rating and results communicated internal and external\n• Corrective action defined in case of red ratings or continuous Yellow results",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.11",null,"Is the process responsible aware how well the Veoneer expectations have been met by the process, from the customer point of view?","R",null,"Review:\nVeoneer evaluation result is subject to corrective action (or, if satisfying, to continuous improvement)?",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.12","Failure Management / Problem Solving\nVS 63\n\nVDA P6 6.5.2\nVDA P6 6.5.3\n\nVDA P7 7.4 \nVDA P7 7.5 \n\n\n\n\n","Are customer rejects regularly analyzed and actions derived from this analysis and implemented","R","G","Review:\nVeoneer returns activity associated with line improvement.\nVeoneer NCMs are closed in an appropriate timeframe, with Veoneer approval",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.13",null,"Are product / process failures systematically analyzed and corrected with involvement from a cross functional team? (Example: internal ppm, scrap, machine downtime) ","R","G","Review:\n• Company Policy - Continuous improvement activity.\n• Failure costs must be recorded and evaluated according to the cause.\n• Personnel + Test equipment are available to carry out analysis of defect part\n• Red Bin Audit requirement\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.14",null,"Are common problem solving methods used? (Example: 7 Tools, 8D)  Are tools to monitor the process in use? (Example: PDCA, QOS, etc.)","R",null,"Review:\n• Use of method and results\n• FMEA and control plan are updated as a result of the root cause analysis\n• Corrective action effectiveness is monitored\n\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.15",null,"Are “lessons learned” systematically documented and is this information used by the process responsible, also on similar and new processes for continuous improvement?\n(Including multiple facilities with the same potential failure)","R",null,"Review:\n• Confirm procedure for yoko-ten implemented",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.16","Change Management \nVDA P6 6.1.5 ","Are changes to the product or process in the course of serial production tracked and documented?\n\n","R",null,"Review:\n• The change procedure – i.e. from the change request to implementation – must be clearly described and ownership/responsibility established. \nVeoneer must be involved. \nT• he effect of any changes must be analyzed before they are introduced. \n• Scope of applicability for own production and sub-contractors. \n• Deviation from requirements (including packaging and transport)",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.17","VDA P7 7.3","Is the supply of parts ensured?","R",null,"Review:\nVS 51 On time part performance                   Emergency plans\nSupplier has 24 hour contact for Veoneer.\nInternal and external capacities",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.18","VDA P7 7.3 ","Is the suppliers facility systematically and regularly analyzed by a cross functionally team on contingency planning? \n\n","R",null,"Review:\n• Company Policy - Contingency Plan (List document number)\n• The current document reviewed is done by a cross functional team, timely  / risk based review.  \n• Contingency assessed for Fire, Flood, Explosion, Strike, Weather, Act of god. \n• PESTEL factors - Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental and Legal factors.\n• Review contingency for utilities failure management - Water, Gas, Oil (Fuel) and Electricity.  ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["2.19","VDA P6  6.1..1 ","Is there a documented process to transfer the project from development to serial production?\n\n\n","R",null,"Review:\n• Handover from (development) project and serial production is defined. \n• PPAP (production process and product approval) has been given.\n• Safe launch validation is established. VS-412. \n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["3 Process Documentation"]
["3.1","Process FMEA\nVS 104","Does a process flowchart and P-FMEA exist?","R",null,"Review:\n• Flowchart, process layout and P-FMEA documents\n• Key product and process numbers are defined, documented and a projection-vs.-actual comparison made.  ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["3.2","Control Plan\nVDA P6 6.2.1 +7.1\nVSM","Is a Control Plan existing and current when compared to actual process?",null,"G","Review Control Plan at work site and inspection plans.\n(Annual Layout inspection - VSM requirement)\n(Annual PV test - Customer Requirements)",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["3.3","VS 41,  VDA P6 6.5.4","Are Dock Audit requirements defined and part of the Control plan: agreed for launch or after severe nonconformities?","R",null,"Review:\n• Dock Audit Report process.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["3.4","VSM, VDA P6 6.1.1","Are all delivered products approved by the Veoneer?","R",null,"Review:\n• PSW signed by Veoneer.\n• IRW and action plan tracked to closure.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["3.5","Measurement & Inspection devices\nVDA P6 6.2.1\nVDA P6 6.4.2\n VDA P6 6.4.3 \n\n","Have Gage R&R studies according to AIAG Manual MSA been performed on all equipment / methods used for manufacturing and test?","R",null,"Review:\n• Gage R&R documents against AIAG requirements",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["3.6",null,"Is appropriate action taken, when MSA results do not meet requirements?","R",null,"Review:\n• Action plan to improve and qualify inspection devices",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["3.7",null,"Are all gages, including employee owned gages, registered for scheduled calibration?","R","G","Review:\n• Randomly chose a gage and verify it is and compliant to calibration procedure and documented \n• Review calibration procedure for master rejects and boundary samples ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["3.8",null,"Is there a system to manage parts and gages when unplanned gage damage or out of calibration condition occurs?","R",null,"Review:\n• Calibration procedure and suspect material procedure",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["3.9",null,"Has a correlation study been done between test sites for measurement system on similar parameter?","R",null,"Review:\n• Tester data correlation results between sites (internal to supplier or between supplier and Veoneer) • For example:   electrical parameters and function, tensile tester, hardness measurement, color measurement device, air permeability",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["3.10","Change Control\nVS 7\nVDA P6 6.1.5","Is there a process to control and react to changes that impact product realization","R",null,"Review:\n• Requirements for Veoneer notification are defined and compliant.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4 Manufacturing Process \n4.1 Material Flow\n"]
["4.1.1","Incoming Material \n\nIATF 16949 6.1.2.3\nVDA P6 6.1.2","Are incoming goods inspected systematically according to their specification and according to the control plan?",null,"G","\n• Inspection procedure to Control Plan\n• Inspection instructions and results are properly documented\n• Goods are easy to locate, identifiable and traceable in the incoming area\n• Approved parts are clearly identified prior to being put into inventory\n\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.2","VDA P6 6.1.2 ","Is there a procedure for non-conforming incoming material","R","G","Review: \n• Procedure and verify nonconforming material is segregated (Quarantine/ blocking are) and identified.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.3","VDA P6 6.1.2 ","Is corrective action required of (sub-) suppliers for non-conformances? ","R","G","Review:\n• Responses are timely.\n• Effectiveness is verified.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.4","VDA P6 6.1.2 ","If incoming inspection is waived, is there evidence for sufficient (sub-) supplier's component quality assurance?","R","G","Review: \n• Procedure/criteria for decision to waive inspection.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.5","VDA P 6 6.1.4","Are the necessary identifications/records/approvals available and allocated properly to the incoming materials?",null,null,"• Check identification, release on material / systems, Material certificate, CC/ SC, traceable",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.6","FIFO\nVDA P6 6.1.4","Are material and goods handled according to first in /first out (FIFO)?","R","G","Review:\n• procedure / Go & See\n• Verify traceability of material to the manufacturing equipment.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.7","VDA 6.1.2","Are the necessary quantities/production batch sizes of incoming material available right in time and at the right location?",null,"G","• Check on an example, if right product is at right place, in right quality (approved) in right quantity and with right packing and documentation.  \n• Check also MRP System data ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.8","Material Handling \nVDA P6 6.1.3","Are products / components stored in an appropriate manner and are transport facilities / packing arrangements suitable for the special characteristics of the products / components? ",null,"G","• Protection from damage during storage and packing is guaranteed.\n• Customer-specific packaging instructions have been implemented.\n• Tidiness and cleanliness in storage areas / containers are assumed.\n• Protection of components against environmental / climate influences have been arranged.\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.9","VDA P6 6.1.4","What is procedure for specified storage time / durability of time and/or temperature materials?","R","G","Review:\n• Verify shelf life and storage process for time and/or  temperature materials, appropriate equipment ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.10","VDA P6 6.2.6","Are similar parts (for example different CS sensor types) clearly identifiable and segregated to avoid mix up in production and ware house ?","R","G","Review:\n• Process / Go & See",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.11","VDA P6 6.2.6","Is the flow of materials and parts secured against mixing /wrong items? (for example engineering level A/B)",null,"G","• Check for method to assure segregation, prevent mixing of different items,                                     • • Process to return part, reworked parts handling, re-use of measured parts ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.12","VDA P6 6.1.4","Are suitable production containers for product transport within manufacturing clearly defined and storage space is available?",null,"G","• Go & See storage and transport of production material on the line.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.13","Rework\nVDA P6 6.2.5","If rework is performed are parts identified to the agreed Veoneer requirements?  ","R",null,"Review:\n• Rework process is in the PFMEA, control plan and work instructions.  \n• Separate area available. \n• Operator trained on rework process.\n• Traceability records for reworked parts.\n• Individual part marking\n• and incoming to Veoneer packaging identification.\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.14","Red Bin Audit \nHandling of Non-Conforming Material\n8.3\nVDA P6 6.2.5","Are all nonconforming parts identified and then contained in Red Bin (Early detection and removal of incorrectly used parts must be guaranteed)?","R","G","Review:\n• Non-conforming Procedure.\nGo & See\n• Is the quarantine area identified?\n• Timely and proper disposition of non-conforming material is ensured\n• All potentially non-conforming material is identified and treated as nonconforming",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.15","Delays\nVDA P6 6.2.5","Is there a system for delivery suspension in place and communication to Veoneer set up in case of non conforming material or material-shortage?","R",null,"Review:\n• MRB Material Review Board minutes\n• Cross functional team assessment in daily production meeting and information flow\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.1.16","Recycling \nVDA P6 6.2.5 ","The process for recycling for production residues, separated, reworked and re-used parts from product audits and tests, etc. must be clearly regulated. ","R","G","• Review procedure and assure Veoneer agreement (drawing).\n• In-plant residues must be appropriately quantified, marked and stored.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4. Manufacturing Process\n 4.2 Production Process"]
["4.2.1","Process Equipment\nVDA P6 6.2.1","Is the needed production equipment available and fit for use?","R","G","Review:\n• Procedure for equipment validation and approved\n\n• Unreleased equipment is identified and appropriately stored to avoid unauthorized use.\n• Backup processes are available and approved to avoid production breakdown.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.2",null,"Are Veoneer/customer owned tools and equipment clearly identifiable (tagged) and handled according to Veoneer /customer requirements?",null,"G","• Property tag  clearly displayed on the tool/equipment\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.3",null,"Are malfunctioning automated processes temporarily replaced by manual operation?","R","G","Review:\n• Check company policy / approval\n\n• These operations are handled according to the process standards for manual processes (regarding documentation, training, inspection)\n• These instances are documented and tied to lot traceability records.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.4","Working Conditions\n\nVDA P6 6.4.3","Are all working areas kept in a way that the specified product quality and quantity can be produced continually?",null,"G","• Working conditions and housekeeping are subject to evaluation and continuous improvement (Example: Safety, 5S, programs enough light for visual checks, and noise inspection in quiet areas, Ergonomics ).",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.5",null,"Is manufacturing environment controlled according to product requirements (i.e.: Humidity, Temperature, Air Pressure, and Time)?","R","G","Review:\n• Method and confirm reaction plan",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.6",null,"As applicable: Is defectivity (cleanliness and particle) controlled in the clean room and process equipment?","R","G","Review:\n• Method and confirm reaction plan",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.7","Special Process VS 69\nVDA P6 6.2.3","Has the manufacturing process been systematically analyzed for critical/special processes (for example plating, coating, welding, riveting, and heat treatment)? ","R",null,"Review:\n• Process of analyzing and documenting critical sub processes  ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.8","Special Process VS 69\nVDA P6 6.2.3","Are critical/special process parameters monitored and controlled?","R",null,"Review:\n• Critical/special process controls / historical data",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.9","Special Process VS 69\nVDA P6 6.2.3","Are critical/special process parameters part of the control plan?","R","G","Review:\n• Critical/special processes are in place, analyzed and assessed on annual basis (VS 69 special process / CQI xxx). \n• Compare parameters to Control Plan.\n\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.10","Process Parameter\nVDA P6 6.2.1","Are process parameters properly controlled and prevented from unauthorized changes?","R","G","Review:\n• Confirm method to assure process parameters are controlled or locked out from adjustment",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.11","Testing\nVDA P6 6.4.2","Can the quality requirements be monitored effectively with the test, inspection and measurement facilities employed?",null,"G","• Test and measurement equipment in use is listed in the production control plan.\n• Measures must be taken and documented in process malfunctions.\n• Quality and process data are logged in such a way that they can be assessed.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.12","Operator Responsibility\nVDA P6  6.3.1","Are operators empowered (given responsibility and authority) to monitor the quality of product and process?","R",null,"Review:\n• Competencies, duties and authority of each employee in their particular area of responsibility must be specified. \n• Quality awareness in employees must be encouraged with appropriate measures and regularly refreshed\n• Personnel should be regularly informed about the customer's current quality standard.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.13","VDAP6 6.4.3 ","Are identification of inspection and test status for products maintained and suitable at each stage of production?",null,"G","• Confirm the system and review example \n• Bypassing or miss a process step possible? \n• Are the workstations and test/inspection areas suitable for the requirements ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.14","Product and Process Documents\n4.2.3 + 7.5\nVDA P6. 6.3.2 \n","Do work, inspection and packaging instructions exist and do they clearly describe process operations to employees?","R",null,"Review:\n• Work instructions\n• A system for products and process approval must exist\n• The marking of approvals is determined.\n• Records of approvals are documented and archived.\n• Special releases / deviation permission are marked and documented.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.15","VDA P6 6.2.1","Are the instructions in accordance with the process?",null,"G","Go & See / compare instruction to actual process\n\n• Workers are able to read and understand the instructions (language problem)?\n\n• Instructions refer to corrective action measures in case of non-conformances.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.16","VDA P6 6.2.1","Are the instructions controlled documents? In case multiple copies of instructions are necessary, are the documents the same revision?","R","G","• Confirm method of control of documents including revision \n\n• Controlled part and assembly drawings exist. The instructions / drawings identify CC/SCs (VS 52)?",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.17","VDA P6 6.2.1","Do Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for chemicals and hazardous materials used in the process exist, and do the personnel using the material know and understand the safety requirements?","R","G","Review:\n• Go & See / ask personnel for MSDS on material in their area",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.18","Production Start-Up - First piece sample inspection\n\nVDA P6 6.2.2 ","Are first produced parts after shift start-up, order changes or maintenance activities specially inspected to detect errors (for example incorrect parts used, wrong parameter setup, operator error...)?","R",null,"Review:\n• Part approval process / Maintenance log\n• Are these inspections / tests clearly defined in work instructions and recorded.\n\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.19",null,"Are startup/first piece inspections documented and maintained?","R","G","Review:\n• Confirm documented inspections\n• Review startup after break down and maintenance. • Setting plans, setting aids and reference parts must be available at workplace",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.20","Process Control and SPC\n8.2.3 + 8.4\nVDA P6 6.2.3","Are process control charts maintained and analyzed / including reaction plans?","R","G","• Review chart, see documented reaction plan for out of control situation",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.21",null,"Are process records (i.e.: control charts) correctly designed (i.e.: regarding control limits) and known and understood by the personnel creating the records?",null,"G","• Go & See controls on the floor / ask personnel\n• Process records clearly indicate deviations from the specification.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.22","Initial process capability\nIATF 16949 8.3.3.3, 8.3.5.2, 8.6.4\nAIAG Manual APQP & MSA\nVS 52, VSM,\nVDA P6 6.2.4 ","Are CC/SC characteristics identified, and controlled by SPC or other as defined is VS 52?","R","G","Review:\n• SPC control charts at the worksite \n• All CC/SC variable characteristics are capable.\n• Are sample size  and sampling plan appropriate",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.23","VDA P6 6.2.4","For continuous production is appropriate action taken, when Cpk  is below specification?","R",null,"Review:\n• Action plan for Cpk below specification.\n• Capability studies have been performed according to AIAG and VS 52 requirements.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.24","Mistake -proofing\n8.5.2.2 \nVDA P6 6.2.3 + 6.2.6","Is mistake-proofing (Poka-Yoke) in place, functioning and controlled?",null,"G","Review:\n• Poka Yoke verification process.\n• Existing Poka Yoke devices cannot be bypassed or switched off.\n• Master verification samples are used to validate the Poka Yoke.\n• All mistake proofing devices are validated regularly (wear and tear).\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.25","VDA P6 6.2.3 + 6.2.6","Does the Poka-Yoke stop the process for reject part review; or at a minimum, segregate the reject part from the good parts automatically?",null,"G","• Method for parts segregation and handling",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.26","VDA P6 6.2.3 + 6.2.6 ","When sensors are used are they programmed for a state change?  Example: Sensor must cycle to accept a part, to assure sensor is not faulty?","R","G","Review:\n• Method for verification of on/off conditions.\n• Master verification samples are used to validate the sensors.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.2.27","Tool and equipment Storage\n \nVDA P6 6.4.4","Are tools, equipment and test/inspection facilities stored correctly?",null,"G","• Tools and test equipment are properly stored and managed.\n• All tools and test equipment properly checked and are marked with their original and changed status.\n• Tidiness, cleanliness and protection against environmental influences are ensure.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4. Manufacturing Process\n 4.3 Final Inspection, Packing, Storage, Shipping"]
["4.3.1","Final Inspection / Shipping\nVS 244 + VS 41\nVDA P6 6.6.1","Is all finished product systematically inspected, requirements met and released before Storage?","R","G","Review: \nConfirm Veoneer/customer requirements  agreed for product inspection release and approval .\nThe responsibility to approve products for shipment is clearly defined.\nIs assured that only approved parts can be sent to the customer. \nThere is a process of communication in the event if shipment of products is blocked.                            Dock audits requirements and results. If dock audit is requested by Veoneer. \n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.3.2","VDA P6 6.6.2","Are quantities / production batch sizes aligned with requirements and are they forwarded to the next process stage/warehouse in a targeted manner?",null,null,"Review: \n• Suitable transport facilities and storage location available\n• Identification/labeling of parts/material\n• Right quantities available physical and in MRP System\n• Is there a controlled process for handling or NOK parts\n• Veoneer requirements available and agreed in case rework is implemented ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.3.3","VS 244 /VS 246 VDA P6 6.6.3","Is all finished product packaged according to customer / Veoneer approved specifications and are they stored in an appropriate manner?",null,"G","• Verify Veoneer shipping/packaging requirements, • • Packaging specification available and agreed\n• Labels conforms to VS-244.\n• Parts are protected against the effects of climate and environment\n• Protection against damage\n• Cleanliness and tidiness are assured in storage and packing",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.3.4","Traceability\nVS 4\nVDA P6 6.6.2 6.6.4\n","Are components and products identifiable and traceable from incoming to delivery? \nIs there evidence of annual Trial being conducted and is the time to retrieve and data reconciliation compliant to maximum time requirements in VS 4?\n","R","G","Review: \n• Records of releases/ are documented and archived\n• Special releases/deviation approvals are identified and documented\n\n• Last exercise conducted, time to retrieve and reconcile data.\n• Verify exercise contains both Forward and Backward Traceability examples",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.3.5",null,"Is a Traceability flowchart available and what kind of data are recorded?","R",null,"Review:\n• Traceability flowchart available and current. Data in accordance to the Traceability  Data Requirements Chart (in VS 4)\n• Record retention for 20 Years and Archive condition",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.3.6",null,"Do manufacturing lot sizes meet Veoneer requirements? Is a new lot number assigned after Raw material, Process, Tooling/Equipment or Personnel change occurs?","R",null,"Review:\n• Supplier definition of lot size and method for compliance to Veoneer requirements (24 Hours Production or 20, 000 pieces maximum).\n• Documented process to assign new Lot Number to product.\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.3.7","VDA P7 7.1","A traceability data available for Special characteristics SC/CC ","R",null,"Review:\n• Evidence available of tracking and archiving  special  characteristics (documentation requirements) and record retention\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4. Manufacturing Process\n 4.4 Support Processes"]
["4.4.1","Manpower\n6.2\nVDA P6  6.3.1\nVDA P7  7.6","Are all personnel (all shifts and temporary employees) – manufacturing, maintenance and support, trained and instructed properly (including automotive industry quality requirements)?","R",null,"Review:\n• Training matrix / documents for all level of personnel\n• Customer, standard and legislative requirements\n• Veoneer Standard language (English) is understood by main contact personnel.\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.2","VDA P6 6.3.3 ","Is there a new hire / temporary position training requirement to assure employees are approved prior to performing the job?","R",null,"Review:\n• New hire requirements\n• Training matrix and procedures are in place and documented.\n• Are training needs defined for each job description?\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.3","VDA P6.6.3.2 ","Is training effectiveness measured and documented?","R",null,"Review:\n• Training policy for effectiveness measure",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.4","Supplier \nInternal audits\nVDA P6 6.5.4","Are processes and products internally audited regularly?","R","G","Review:\n• Audit plan for Product and Processes and reasons defined\n• Audit findings regularly reviewed and actions closed per schedule.\n• Audit frequency is adjusted to production volume, criticality of product / process, and process stability.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.5","VDA P6 6.5.4","Are auditors qualified and experienced? ","R",null,"Review:\n• Training matrix",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.6","VDA P6 6.5.4 ","Are Veoneer audit findings and systemic corrective actions from NCMs incorporated into the internal audit?","R",null,"Review:\n• Process to incorporate Veoneer/customer concerns. (i.e.:  Dock audit, red bin audit,)",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.7","Tooling and Machine Preventive Maintenance\nVDA P6 6.4.1","Is the process, test equipment and tooling part of the preventive maintenance system?","R","G","Review:\n• PM schedule\n• The PM system does include monitoring and optimization of maintenance activity frequencies, perishable tooling and machine downtime",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.8",null,"Are planned and unplanned maintenance activities documented?","R",null,"Review:\n• Maintenance Log, work orders, Preventative maintenance, and perishable tooling",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.9",null,"Is needed maintenance equipment / spare parts available?","R","G","Review:\n• Confirm method/system for determining and maintaining spare part inventory",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.10",null,"Is any process interruption systematically requalified after maintenance / breakdowns?  ","R",null,"Review:\n• Procedure for 1st piece/last piece confirmation.  \n• For electronics cleanliness and particle defect inspection on process monitor or production parts ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.11",null,"Do procedures exist for proper equipment power down and power up after extended shutdown?","R",null,"Review equipment start up procedures",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.12","Tooling Life Management\nVDAP6 6.4.1\n","Is there a procedure to assure tooling used for production are under tool life and tool orders are timely?","R",null,"Review:\n• Tooling list.\n• Compare actual tool usage with contract agreement.\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["4.4.13","Spare Part Management\nVDAP7 7.1 \n","Are the Veoneer Requirements satisfied regarding product Spare part Delivery?","R",null,"• Is the supply of spares and replacement parts (in and after serial production phase - Endo of production secured and considered\n",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["5. Improvement"]
["5.1","Continuous Improvement\n8.5.1\nVDA P6 6.5.1 ","Is a comprehensive continuous improvement philosophy deployed throughout the organization including management support?","R",null,"Review: Management Reviews \n• Company Policy Deployment - Vision and Mission, Potential for improvements is continuously determined. \n• Product and Process indicators are defined, measured and controlled including non-conformances",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["5.2","VDA P6 6.5.2","Are process targets defined and are they regularly reviewed and refined?","R",null,"Review:  Regular Production  Reviews \nQuality control charts operated, Process data and - parameter are monitored, actions are introduced and documented. Failure types and their frequency are recorded and evaluated, Failure costs are recorded and assessed against their causes       ",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
["5.3","VSM","Has a lean manufacturing system been implemented?","R",null,"Review:  \n• Lean implementation plan/process.\n• Lean tools uses of APS concepts.\n• Lean manufacturing leader is assigned.",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,1]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"SUM(Q9:Q120)","v":105}]

{"sheet":"Rating System","index":4,"n_rows":1,"n_cols":1,"rows_kept":1,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,5]]}
["Rating System"]

{"sheet":"Mod Index","index":5,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Version","Date","Author","Approved by","Modification","Purpose","Distribution"]
[1,"2018-04-01","Dennis Nielsen\nHakan Soderlund\n","Dennis Nielsen\nSteve Brohm","Included into VS002",null,"AS0-2 15-Nov-2016"]
[1.5,"2020-03-01","Stephane Dumont\n","Dennis Nielsen","Macro bug corrections"]