{"text_format":"1","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":6,"sheets":["Summary Report","Questionnaire","Finding Report","Worksite Hard Copy","Rating System","Mod Index"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":3,"macros":1,"external_links":0,"defined_names":13,"comments":2,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Summary Report","index":0,"n_rows":88,"n_cols":22,"rows_kept":88,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[25,3,25,13],[25,1,25,2],[17,0,17,2],[13,7,13,10],[31,8,32,9],[31,10,32,13],[15,3,15,13],[17,3,17,13],[28,1,28,4],[28,5,28,7],[28,8,28,9],[28,10,28,13],[29,1,30,4],[29,5,30,7],[29,8,30,9],[29,10,30,13],[33,0,35,0],[33,1,34,4],[33,5,34,7],[33,8,34,9],[33,10,34,13],[35,1,36,4],[35,5,36,7],[35,8,36,9],[35,10,36,13],[0,0,1,1],[7,1,7,13],[0,3,1,8],[0,11,0,13],[1,11,1,13],[3,1,3,13],[5,1,5,13],[2,11,2,13],[9,1,9,13],[10,7,10,10],[11,0,11,2],[11,3,11,13],[13,3,13,4],[13,12,13,13],[31,1,32,4],[31,5,32,7],[41,9,41,10],[41,12,41,13],[51,9,51,10],[51,12,51,13],[53,9,53,10],[53,12,53,13],[43,9,43,10],[43,12,43,13],[45,9,45,10],[45,12,45,13],[47,9,47,10],[47,12,47,13],[49,9,49,10],[49,12,49,13],[68,0,69,0],[68,1,75,13],[77,0,77,3],[77,8,77,13],[55,9,55,10],[55,12,55,13],[56,9,56,10],[56,12,56,13],[58,1,58,13],[60,0,61,0],[60,1,67,13]]}
[null,null,null,"VS002 Project Management Audit \n- Summary Report -",null,null,null,null,null,null,"Audit No./Year:"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Audit start date"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Audit end date"]
["Company:"]
[]
["Address:"]
[]
["Process(es):"]
[]
["Products:"]
[]
["Quality Certifications"]
[]
["Total number of employees:",null,null,null,null,null,null,"Employees working in Quality Dept.:"]
[]
["Main customer(s):"]
[]
["Main raw material supplier used:"]
[]
["Audit reason:","Regular audit:"]
[null,"Initial audit for new supplier:"]
[null,"Initial audit for new process:"]
[null,"Audit due to quality incident:"]
[null,"Audit due to process change (for example relocation):"]
[]
[null,"Other Reason:"]
[]
[]
[null,"Name",null,null,null,"Position",null,null,"Phone ",null,"E-Mail"]
["Auditor(s):",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Format cells to same shape and as text fields, shall extend when more names are needed"]
[]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null," "]
["Participants and position:"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"All pages shall be printable in DIN A 4."]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Questionnaire sheet may become 2 or 3 pages when printing- to be tested"]
[]
[]
["Audit Summary:"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"This audit",null,null,"Previous audit"]
[null,"Audit date"]
[]
[null,"Number of Major Non-conformities:",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Questionnaire!I:I,\"X\")","v":0}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"RED"]
[null,"Number of Minor Non-conformities:",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Questionnaire!J:J,\"X\")","v":0},null,null,null,null,null,"YELLOW"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"GREEN"]
[null,"Number of Improvement Potentials:",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Questionnaire!K:K,\"X\")","v":0}]
[]
[null,"Amount of answered questions in %",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Questionnaire!G:G,\"X\")/29","v":1}]
[]
[null,"Amount of answered questions: (max. 29)",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"COUNTIF(Questionnaire!G:G,\"X\")","v":29}]
[]
[null,"Latest correction date:"]
[]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Corrective actions\nto be completed (Audit date + 90 days)",null,null,"Corrective actions\ncompleted"]
["Audit Result",{"$f":"IF(AND(J44=0,J46=0,J48<=5),P47,\nIF(AND(J44=0,AND(J46>=1,J46<=3),J48>=6),P46,\nIF(OR(J44>0,J46>=4,J48>=10),P45,P46))\n)","v":"GREEN"},null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF(L2<>\"\",EDATE(L2,3),\"\")","v":""},null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null," "]
[]
["Comments"]
[]
["Improvement Areas:"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
["Best Practice Areas:"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
["Date, Process Manager signature",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Date, Auditor signature"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
["x"]
["x"]
["x"]

{"sheet":"Questionnaire","index":1,"n_rows":37,"n_cols":13,"rows_kept":37,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[19,0,19,5],[14,0,14,5],[0,2,2,5],[3,0,4,0],[3,1,4,1],[3,2,4,2],[3,5,4,5],[3,3,4,3],[3,4,4,4],[3,12,4,12],[3,6,3,7],[0,6,0,11],[1,6,1,11],[2,6,2,11],[3,8,3,11]]}
[null,null,"VS002 Project Management Audit\n- Questionnaire - ",null,null,null,"Audit No./Year:",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!L1<>\"\",'Summary Report'!L1,\"\")","v":""}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"Audit Date:",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!L2<>\"\",'Summary Report'!L2,\"\")","v":""}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"Process:",null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!B8<>\"\",'Summary Report'!B8,\"\")","v":""}]
["Quest.\nNo.","Section\nAudit Reference","Question ","Review","Go See","Guidelines and Guideline-Questions","Audited",null,"Answers/ Rating",null,null,null,"Observations/ Findings / Remarks\nNote:  For non-conformance findings: record the  document, part number, process number, machine number, operator etc.  that has been audited for  traceability and future follow up."]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"yes","no","Major","Minor","Improvement","Conform"]
["1 Project Management System"]
["1.1","VSM VDA 6.3 P2 2.1","Is the project organization (Project Management) established and are tasks & authorities specified for the Leader and Team members? \n","R",null,"Review:\n• Project management matches Veoneer requirements.\n• The company has a process for project management in place.\n• Authority has been defined in project organization.\n• The sub-suppliers have been integrated.\n• Is there a functioning  SQP/APQP process?\n• Is the responsibility and authority clearly defined for the SQP/APQP?","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.2","VSM VDA 6.3 P2 2.2","Are the resources required for the SQP project development planned and available? \n\n","R",null,"Review:\n• Resources are scheduled according to contract. The critical path has been factored in.\n• In resource planning the workload of employees must be considered. \n• Personnel have proper skills and abilities.\n• Changes (regardless of the trigger) call for a revision and, where applicable, adjustment to the schedule.\n• Sub-Suppliers must be kept in mind and involved in project planning.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.3","VSM VDA 6.3 P2 2.3 + 3.3","Is there a project plan and has this been agreed with the Veoneer?\n","R",null,"Review:\n• The project schedule fulfills Veoneer requirements (also with reference to the Veoneer's milestones).\n• Veoneer Supplier Manual - Project management requirements\n• All project participants (incl. the Veoneer) will be informed of any changes. \n• Critical delivery volumes will be taken into account. \n• Project Plan / in case of a complex program.\n• A review will take place at each milestone. ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.4","VSM VDA 6.3 P2 2.4,              VS 7","Is change management in the project ensured by the project organization?","R",null,"Review:\n• Where applicable, changes will trigger a feasibility assessment. \n• For changes affecting product cost, timing, and quality  the risk must be assessed with Veoneer.  \n• If delivery volumes are critical, the sub-suppliers will be integrated.\n• Changes are documented in accordance with internal requirements \n\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.5","VSM VDA 6.3 P2 2.5","Are the responsible personnel within the supplier and in the Veoneer's company involved in the change control system?","R",null,"Review:\n• The responsibilities for change management have been defined. \n• Change management has been regulated.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.6","VSM VDA 6.3 P2 2.6","Is there a DV/PV plan for the project? Is this implemented and monitored regularly for compliance?","R",null,"Review:\n• All DV/PV relevant activities must be integrated in the SQP/project plan.\n• The DV/PV plan meets Veoneer requirements.\n• Adherence to the DV/PV plan will be reviewed regularly.    •  An escalation will be initiated where necessary. ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.7","VSM VDA 6.3 P2 ","Have quality targets and/or SPC requirements been clearly defined with Veoneer and are they subject to continuous improvement?","R",null,"Review: \n• Legal requirements targets updated , distributed and implemented.\n• Veoneer  drawing/specification requirements targets updated, distributed and implemented.\n• NCMs, lessons learned\n• VS-52 [CC]/[SC] management understood and implemented.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["1.8","VSM VDA 6.3 P2 2.7","Is there an established escalation process and is this implemented effectively?","R",null,"Review:\n• If deviations are found during a milestone review, there must be an escalation process in place (risk management).\n• The criteria for escalation must be defined (incl. responsibility and authority). \n• If special risks have been identified in technologies, suppliers or supplier countries, these must also be taken into account in escalation management","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2 Planning of Product and Process Development  "]
["2.1","VSM VDA 6.3 3.1","Are the product and process-specific requirements identified and understood?","R",null,"Review:\n• Have all requirements been identified and checked? Veoneer clearance must be requested by non-fulfillment, if applicable\n• Responsibilities to sub-suppliers / service suppliers, performance interface.\n• Product development requirements. \n• Special characteristics must be identified.\n• Contract Review available and agreed.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.2","VS-5,  VDA 6.3 P3  3.1","Supplier complies to substance use restriction standard","R",null,"Review:\n• Includes product- and production materials, equipment and racks.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.3","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 3.2","Has manufacturing feasibility been assessed in a cross-functional manner, based on the requirements which have been determined for product & process?","R",null,"Review:\n• Supplier has a procedure to assess, release and distribute  manufacturing feasibility. \n• All requirements in the manufacturing feasibility study have been taken into consideration.\n• All responsible partners/departments are integrated.              • The approval process to issue quotation must be controlled\n\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["2.4","VSM VDA 6.3 P3  3.5","Is project planning arranged for sourcing Purchased products and services? ","R",null,"Review:\n• Sub-supplier management is implemented, and activity planned. \n• Performance interface and supply chain agreements have been completed. \n• Sub-suppliers for equipment, machines, tools, services and systems are integrated.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3 Implementation of  Product and Process Development"]
["3.1","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.1","Have the Design FMEA / Process FMEA been developed? Are they up-dated as the project progresses and are corrective actions identified and managed according to action plan?","R",null,"Review:\n• FMEA is incorporated in the development plan.\n• Implementation of FMEA and interface has been arranged.\n• Significant characteristics have been identified and marked in the FMEA.\n• Effectiveness of the measures has been proved.\n• FMEA updating is guaranteed.\n• Compare flowchart, process layout and P-FMEA documents\n• Compare FMEA rating to AIAG FMEA Manual latest edition","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.2","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.1","Veoneer Specific Master P-FMEA implemented, if applicable?","R",null,"Review:\n• Implementation process","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.3","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.1","Has the process been systematically developed and evaluated by a cross functional team including product and process CC/SC characteristics?","R",null,"Review:\n• P-FMEA for documented team involvement","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.4","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.2","Are the actions derived from the plans for product and process development (DV/PV) put into effect?","R",null,"Review:\n• Operational requirements for the product / process have been taken into account.\n• Suitable methods to safeguard product development are established, e.g. Mold Flow , DFM/DFA, designed experiments, etc.\n• A DV/PV-plan results for prototypes and pre-production trials is available. \n• Test and inspection planning is incorporated in Q-planning\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.5","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 3.4, 4.3","Are the personnel resources in place and qualified?       ","R",null,"Review:\n•  Regular needs assessments will be carried out during product and process development.                                          •  A recruitment system/planning are available. \n• Personnel capacity is planned and provided for. \n• Personnel is qualified for the proposed assignments.\n• Outsourced processes and services have been taken into account. \n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.6","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.4","Is the infrastructure in place and appropriate?","R",null,"Review:\n• A procedure for resource appraisal is in place, i.e. availability of \n- Measuring/Test equipment\n- Machines and plants\n- laboratory facilities\n• Infrastructure needs have been established and provided.\n• Capacity is available or planned at a fixed point in time. \n• Process steps affected by shortfalls will be made visible.  \n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.7","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.4","Is the test and measurement system calibrated and analyzed?","R",null,"Review:\n• Measurement System Analysis\n• Calibration plan ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.8","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.5","Based on the requirements, are the necessary evidence and releases available for the various phases?","R",null,"Review:\n• Released according to the development schedule has been given for \n− all individual components\n− assemblies \n− parts from suppliers\n• Status reports in line with the SQP (project plan) and Veoneer's milestone plan have been issued.  \n• Verification and validation for product and process are provided and approved. \n• PPAP packages are provided and approved.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.9","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.6","Are the productions control plans used for the various phases and are production, test and inspection documents derived from them?","R",null,"Review:\n• A production control plan has been prepared for the following phases: \n- First Production Trial run (if requested by Veoneer) \n- PPAP production trial run\n- series\n• All product related assemblies, components, materials along with the production process, from incoming to shipping, are included in the production control plan. \n-Review defined responsibilities, methods, frequencies, and reaction plans","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.10","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.6\nVS 52","Does the Control Plan contain all critical and significant characteristics (CC/SC)?","R",null,"Review:\n• Compare Control Plan to part Drawing, Flow Chart, PFMEA & Process\n• Review control methods on Control Plan - SPC - Reaction Plan","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.11","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.7","Has a PPAP production trial run been carried out under serial production conditions to obtain production approval / release?","R",null,"Review:\n• A production trial/production test has been carried out under serial conditions. \n• Production Trial Run Checklist and Capacity report\n• Critical delivery volumes have been taken into account. \n• Proof that agreed quantities can be produced / has been supplied. \n• The agreed production quantities and flexibility have been taken into account.\n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.12","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.7\nVS 412","Is an early containment procedure applied according to VS 412?","R","G","Review:\n• Conformance to  VS 412 \n• Go and see:  Inspection Area handling of\nnon-conforming materials.","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.13","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.8","Are the planning activities associated with outsourced products and services implemented effectively?","R",null,"Review:\n• Regular progress checks with sub-suppliers.\n• Sub-supplier deviations are detected early and corrective actions are introduced. \n","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.14","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.9","Is the transfer of the project to production controlled in order to secure the product launch?","R",null,"Review:\n• A structured handover from the development team to production. \n• A complete internal production release is carried out before the first regular deliveries are made. \n• specifications are verified by the actual test results.\n• Initial capability study for special characteristics has been demonstrated According to VS52.\n• PPAP warrants approved by Veoneer","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.15","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.7","If applicable:  Is there a documented system ensuring  IRW  approval prior to SOP? ","R",null,"Review:\n• Action plan closure for IRW","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.16","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4 4.7","If applicable: Are master samples approved by the Veoneer and maintained by the supplier?","R",null,"Review:\n• Check for master samples and Veoneer approval. ","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]
["3.17","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Suppliers only: Do manufacturing lot sizes meet Veoneer requirements?","R",null,"Review:\n• Verify supplier has Veoneer expectations - lot size","X",null,null,null,null,"X"]

{"sheet":"Finding Report","index":2,"n_rows":34,"n_cols":15,"rows_kept":34,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,4,1,7],[2,4,2,7]]}
[null,null,null,null,"VS002 Project Management Audit \n- Audit Finding Report  -",null,null,null,"Audit No. / Year:",{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!L1<>\"\",'Summary Report'!L1,\"\")","v":""}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Audit date:",{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!L2<>\"\",'Summary Report'!L2,\"\")","v":""}]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"Process:",{"$f":"IF('Summary Report'!B8<>\"\",'Summary Report'!B8,\"\")","v":""}]
["Dev. No.","Systematic","Process specific","Audit Question Number","Finding / Improvement potential","Rating","Root Cause","Corrective action","Responsible","Planned Correction\nDate\n(DD-MMM-YYYY)","PDCA","Final Completion\nDate\n(DD-MMM-YYYY)","Follow-up / Comments / References"]
[1,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"A5","v":1}]
[2,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,{"$f":"A6","v":2}]
[3,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,3]
[4,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,4]
[5,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,5]
[6,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,6]
[7,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,7]
[8,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,8]
[9,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,9]
[10,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,10]
[11,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,11]
[12,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,12]
[13,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,13]
[14,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,14]
[15,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,15]
[16,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,16]
[17,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,17]
[18,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,18]
[19,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,19]
[20,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,20]
[21,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,21]
[22,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,22]
[23,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,23]
[24,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,24]
[25,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,25]
[26,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,26]
[27,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,27]
[28,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,28]
[29,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,29]
[30,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,30]

{"sheet":"Worksite Hard Copy","index":3,"n_rows":40,"n_cols":18,"rows_kept":40,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[17,0,17,5],[22,0,22,5],[20,12,20,17],[0,3,0,5],[0,6,0,15],[0,17,1,17],[1,3,1,5],[1,6,1,15],[2,6,2,15],[2,16,2,17],[3,0,4,17],[5,0,6,0],[5,1,6,1],[5,2,6,2],[5,3,6,3],[5,4,6,4],[5,5,6,5],[5,6,5,7],[5,8,5,11],[5,12,6,17],[14,12,14,17],[7,0,7,17],[9,12,9,17],[10,12,10,17],[11,12,11,17],[12,12,12,17],[13,12,13,17],[15,12,15,17],[16,12,16,17],[17,12,17,17],[18,12,18,17],[19,12,19,17],[21,12,21,17],[22,12,22,17],[23,12,23,17],[24,12,24,17],[25,12,25,17],[26,12,26,17],[27,12,27,17],[36,12,36,17],[37,12,37,17],[38,12,38,17],[39,12,39,17],[28,12,28,17],[29,12,29,17],[30,12,30,17],[31,12,31,17],[32,12,32,17],[33,12,33,17],[34,12,34,17],[35,12,35,17]]}
[null,null,null,"VS002 Project Management Audit",null,null,"Audit No./Year:",null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,null,"This report should be printed and used at the site to write down necessary information.  Please input all final documentation into the applicable sections."]
[null,null,null,"- Questionnaire -",null,null,"Audit Date:"]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"Process:"]
["Document part number, process number, machine number etc.  that has been audited in the findings/remarks column for traceability and future follow-up."]
[]
["Quest.\nNo.","Section\nAudit Reference","Question Items","Review","Go See","Guidelines and Guideline-Questions","Audited",null,"Rating",null,null,null,"Findings / Remarks  "]
[null,null,null,null,null,null,"Yes","No","MA","MI","IP","C"]
[]
["1 Project Management System"]
["1.1","VSM VDA 6.3 P2, P3 + P4","Is the project organization (Project Management) established and are tasks & authorities specified for the Leader and Team members? \n","R",null,"Review:\n• Project management matches Veoneer requirements.\n• The company has a process for project management in place.\n• Authority has been defined in project organization.\n• The sub-suppliers have been integrated.\n• Is there a functioning  SQP/APQP process?\n• Is the responsibility and authority clearly defined for the SQP/APQP?"]
["1.2","VSM VDA 6.3 P2, P3 + P4","Are the resources required for the SQP project development planned and available? \n\n","R",null,"Review:\n• Resources are scheduled according to contract. The critical path has been factored in.\n• In resource planning the workload of employees must be considered. \n• Personnel have proper skills and abilities.\n• Changes (regardless of the trigger) call for a revision and, where applicable, adjustment to the schedule.\n• Sub-Suppliers must be kept in mind and involved in project planning.\n"]
["1.3","VSM VDA 6.3 P2, P3 + P4","Is there a project plan and has this been agreed with the Veoneer?\n","R",null,"Review:\n• The project schedule fulfills Veoneer requirements (also with reference to the Veoneer's milestones).\n• Veoneer Supplier Manual - Project management requirements\n• All project participants (incl. the Veoneer) will be informed of any changes. \n• Critical delivery volumes will be taken into account. \n• Project Plan / in case of a complex program.\n• A review will take place at each milestone. "]
["1.4","VSM VDA 6.3 P2, P3 + P4                VS 7","Is change management in the project ensured by the project organization?","R",null,"Review:\n• Where applicable, changes will trigger a feasibility assessment. \n• For changes affecting product cost, timing, and quality  the risk must be assessed with Veoneer.  \n• If delivery volumes are critical, the sub-suppliers will be integrated.\n• Changes are documented in accordance with internal requirements \n\n"]
["1.5","VSM VDA 6.3 P2, P3 + P4","Are the responsible personnel within the supplier and in the Veoneer's company involved in the change control system?","R",null,"Review:\n• The responsibilities for change management have been defined. \n• Change management has been regulated.\n"]
["1.6","VSM VDA 6.3 P2, P3 + P4","Is there a DV/PV plan for the project? Is this implemented and monitored regularly for compliance?","R",null,"Review:\n• All DV/PV relevant activities must be integrated in the SQP/project plan.\n• The DV/PV plan meets Veoneer requirements.\n• Adherence to the DV/PV plan will be reviewed regularly.    •  An escalation will be initiated where necessary. "]
["1.7","VSM VDA 6.3 P2, P3 + P4","Have quality targets and/or SPC requirements been clearly defined with Veoneer and are they subject to continuous improvement?","R",null,"Review: \n• Legal requirements targets updated , distributed and implemented.\n• Veoneer  drawing/specification requirements targets updated, distributed and implemented.\n• NCMs, lessons learned\n• VS-52 [CC]/[SC] management understood and implemented."]
["1.8","VSM VDA 6.3 P2, P3 + P4","Is there an established escalation process and is this implemented effectively?","R",null,"Review:\n• If deviations are found during a milestone review, there must be an escalation process in place (risk management).\n• The criteria for escalation must be defined (incl. responsibility and authority). \n• If special risks have been identified in technologies, suppliers or supplier countries, these must also be taken into account in escalation management"]
["2 Planning of Product and Process Development  "]
[2.1,"VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Are the product and process-specific requirements identified and understood?","R",null,"Review:\n• Have all requirements been identified and checked? Veoneer clearance must be requested by non-fulfillment, if applicable\n• Responsibilities to sub-suppliers / service suppliers, performance interface.\n• Product development requirements. \n• Special characteristics must be identified.\n• Contract Review available and agreed.\n"]
[2.2000000000000002,"VS-5","Supplier complies to substance use restriction standard","R",null,"Review:\n• Includes product- and production materials, equipment and racks."]
[2.2999999999999998,"VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Has manufacturing feasibility been assessed in a cross-functional manner, based on the requirements which have been determined for product & process?","R",null,"Review:\n• Supplier has a procedure to assess, release and distribute  manufacturing feasibility. \n• All requirements in the manufacturing feasibility study have been taken into consideration.\n• All responsible partners/departments are integrated.            \n• The approval process to issue quotation must be controlled\n\n"]
[2.4,"VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Is project planning arranged for sourcing Purchased products and services? ","R",null,"Review:\n• Sub-supplier management is implemented, and activity planned. \n• Performance interface and supply chain agreements have been completed. \n• Sub-suppliers for equipment, machines, tools, services and systems are integrated.\n"]
["3 Implementation of  Product and Process Development"]
["3.1","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Have the Design FMEA / Process FMEA been developed? Are they up-dated as the project progresses and are corrective actions identified and managed according to action plan?","R",null,"Review:\n• FMEA is incorporated in the development plan.\n• Implementation of FMEA and interface has been arranged.\n• Significant characteristics have been identified and marked in the FMEA.\n• Effectiveness of the measures has been proved.\n• FMEA updating is guaranteed.\n• Compare flowchart, process layout and P-FMEA documents\n• Compare FMEA rating to AIAG FMEA Manual latest edition"]
["3.2","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Veoneer Specific Master P-FMEA implemented, if applicable?","R",null,"Review:\n• Implementation process"]
["3.3","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Has the process been systematically developed and evaluated by a cross functional team including product and process CC/SC characteristics?","R",null,"Review:\n• P-FMEA for documented team involvement"]
["3.4","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Are the actions derived from the plans for product and process development (DV/PV) put into effect?","R",null,"Review:\n• Operational requirements for the product / process have been taken into account.\n• Suitable methods to safeguard product development are established, e.g. Mold Flow , DFM/DFA, designed experiments, etc.\n• A DV/PV-plan results for prototypes and pre-production trials is available. \n• Test and inspection planning is incorporated in Q-planning\n"]
["3.5","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Are the personnel resources in place and qualified?       ","R",null,"Review:\n•  Regular needs assessments will be carried out during product and process development.                                          •  A recruitment system/planning are available. \n• Personnel capacity is planned and provided for. \n• Personnel is qualified for the proposed assignments.\n• Outsourced processes and services have been taken into account. \n"]
["3.6","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Is the infrastructure in place and appropriate?","R",null,"Review:\n• A procedure for resource appraisal is in place, i.e. availability of \no Measuring/Test equipment\no Machines and plants\no laboratory facilities\n• Infrastructure needs have been established and provided.\n• Capacity is available or planned at a fixed point in time. \n• Process steps affected by shortfalls will be made visible.  \n"]
["3.7","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Is the test and measurement system calibrated and analyzed?","R",null,"Review:\n- Measurement System Analysis\n- Calibration plan "]
["3.8","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Based on the requirements, are the necessary evidence and releases available for the various phases?","R",null,"Review:\n• Released according to the development schedule has been given for \n− all individual components\n− assemblies \n− parts from suppliers\n• Status reports in line with the SQP (project plan) and Veoneer's milestone plan have been issued.  \n• Verification and validation for product and process are provided and approved. \n• PPAP packages are provided and approved.\n"]
["3.9","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Are the productions control plans used for the various phases and are production, test and inspection documents derived from them?","R",null,"Review:\n• A production control plan has been prepared for the following phases: \n- First Production Trial run (if requested by Veoneer) \n- PPAP production trial run\n- series\n• All product related assemblies, components, materials along with the production process, from incoming to shipping, are included in the production control plan. \n-Review defined responsibilities, methods, frequencies, and reaction plans"]
[3.11,"VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4\nVS 52","Does the Control Plan contain all critical and significant characteristics (CC/SC)?","R",null,"Review:\n-Compare Control Plan to part Drawing, Flow Chart, PFMEA & Process\n- Review control methods on Control Plan - SPC - Reaction Plan"]
["3.12","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Has a PPAP production trial run been carried out under serial production conditions to obtain production approval / release?","R",null,"Review:\n• A production trial/production test has been carried out under serial conditions. \n• Production Trial Run Checklist and Capacity report\n• Critical delivery volumes have been taken into account. \n• Proof that agreed quantities can be produced / has been supplied. \n• The agreed production quantities and flexibility have been taken into account.\n"]
["3.13","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4\nVS 412","Is an early containment procedure applied according to VS 412?","R","G","Review:\n• Conformance to  VS 412 \n• Go and see:  Inspection Area handling of\nnon-conforming materials."]
["3.14","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Are the planning activities associated with outsourced products and services implemented effectively?","R",null,"Review:\n• Regular progress checks with sub-suppliers.\n• Sub-supplier deviations are detected early and corrective actions are introduced. \n"]
["3.15","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Is the transfer of the project to production controlled in order to secure the product launch?","R",null,"Review:\n• A structured handover from the development team to production. \n• A complete internal production release is carried out before the first regular deliveries are made. \n• specifications are verified by the actual test results.\n• Initial capability study for special characteristics has been demonstrated According to VS52.\n• PPAP warrants approved by Veoneer"]
["3.16","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","If applicable:  Is there a documented system ensuring  IRW  approval prior to SOP? ","R",null,"Review:\n• Action plan closure for IRW"]
["3.17","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","If applicable: Are master samples approved by the Veoneer and maintained by the supplier?","R",null,"Review:\n• Check for master samples and Veoneer approval. "]
["3.18","VSM VDA 6.3 P3 + P4","Suppliers only: Do manufacturing lot sizes meet Veoneer requirements?","R",null,"Review:\n• Verify supplier has Veoneer expectations - lot size"]

{"sheet":"Rating System","index":4,"n_rows":1,"n_cols":1,"rows_kept":1,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,0,0,5]]}
["Rating System"]

{"sheet":"Mod Index","index":5,"n_rows":3,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":3,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[]}
["Version","Date","Author","Approved by","Modification","Purpose","Distribution"]
[1,"2018-04-01","D. Nielsen\nH. Soderlund\n","Dennis Nielsen\nSteve Brohm","Included into VS002"]
[1.5,"2018-03-01","S. Dumont\n","Dennis Nielsen","Macro bug corrections."]